Sign In
Register
Help
Posted 07 May 2005 - 02:12 AM
This post has been edited by CRACKmonkey: 07 May 2005 - 02:13 AM
AW
dam
MultiQuote
#2
Posted 07 May 2005 - 12:37 PM
Don't complain, you better be informed what's goin on so you would understand it...
They were waiting for the ESRB rating, that was the cause of the delay...
But now they got it and they are producing the CDs and boxes, it shouldnt be long now before it hits the shelves!
They were waiting for the ESRB rating, that was the cause of the delay...
But now they got it and they are producing the CDs and boxes, it shouldnt be long now before it hits the shelves!
#3
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:09 PM
"AW is slightly late, looks like it'll be mid-may. The ESRB held up the ratings process when they saw things in the video we sent that weren't mentioned in the application form. Personally, I thought that was WHY we sent the video, to show them all the monotonous little things that would take forever to write down, then you just write down the really major things that could affect the rating. Guess not.
Seems they consider some wall posters of Postal Babes in t-shirts and thongs to be "sexual content". They also mentioned a texture on a computer screen that shows a webpage called "discount dominatrix". Despite the fact that there is no S&M going on, just a pic of a woman fully clothed in non-revealing leather gear and pics of whips and masks and boots, somehow that also constitutes "sexual content".
The stupid thing is that it's not even going to affect our rating, they just decided to be sticklers on detail. So I had to fill in the "sexual content" part of the application over again and re-send it."
Seems they consider some wall posters of Postal Babes in t-shirts and thongs to be "sexual content". They also mentioned a texture on a computer screen that shows a webpage called "discount dominatrix". Despite the fact that there is no S&M going on, just a pic of a woman fully clothed in non-revealing leather gear and pics of whips and masks and boots, somehow that also constitutes "sexual content".
The stupid thing is that it's not even going to affect our rating, they just decided to be sticklers on detail. So I had to fill in the "sexual content" part of the application over again and re-send it."
#11
Posted 10 May 2005 - 05:53 PM
CRACKmonkey, on May 10 2005, 11:45 AM, said:
man i got to admit u got some good come backs, well wut can u expect from a nerd like u ,,,,, you most be on the computer 24/7, i think u need a dick to set u streight .......hey y dont u go suck george bushes dick i here hes a fag like u.
So if we assume that you consider yourself "streight", are we also to assume that sucking a dick is what made you that way?
#13
Posted 10 May 2005 - 06:09 PM
CRACKmonkey, on May 10 2005, 12:05 PM, said:
hey hey hey dont say that im not ur daddy ok so dont make funn of his ways k.
You forgot "drugs are baaaad, m'mkay?"
The best thing about disregarding the concept of honor is, I don't mind having a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. What it lacks in challenge, it makes up in entertainment value.
